Powered by Blogger

Saturday, October 27, 2007

"Killing Germs May Be Hazardous to Your Health"

This is seriously one of the most interesting things I ever read - the microbes in and on our bodies serve much larger purposes than could ever be imagined - the latest research blew my mind. Below is just an excerpt - check out the full article!

http://www.newsweek.com/id/57368

Our war on microbes has toughened them.
Now, new science tells us we should embrace bacteria.


NEWSWEEK
Oct 29, 2007 Issue
Caution: Killing Germs May Be Hazardous to Your Health
By Jerry Adler and Jeneen Interlandi

Behold yourself, for a moment, as an organism. A trillion cells stuck together, arrayed into tissues and organs and harnessed by your DNA to the elemental goals of survival and propagation. But is that all? An electron microscope would reveal that you are teeming with other life-forms. Any part of your body that comes into contact with the outside world—your skin, mouth, nose and (especially) digestive tract—is home to bacteria, fungi and protozoa that outnumber the cells you call your own by 10, or perhaps a hundred, to one.
[. . .]
Relman is a leader in rethinking our relationship to bacteria, which for most of the last century was dominated by the paradigm of Total Warfare. "It's awful the way we treat our microbes," he says, not intending a joke; "people still think the only good microbe is a dead one." We try to kill them off with antibiotics and hand sanitizers. But bacteria never surrender; if there were one salmonella left in the world, doubling every 30 minutes, it would take less than a week to give everyone alive diarrhea. In the early years of antibiotics, doctors dreamed of eliminating infectious disease. Instead, a new paper in The Journal of the American Medical Association reports on the prevalence of Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which was responsible for almost 19,000 deaths in the United States in 2005—about twice as many as previously thought, and more than AIDS [about 17,000]. Elizabeth Bancroft, a leading epidemiologist, called this finding "astounding."

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home